In our ongoing coverage of hair relaxer lawsuits, we provide a brief update on recent developments alongside insights into the evolving landscape of chemical hair straightener litigation. Building on our previous coverage from October, this update offers a snapshot of key updates and ongoing trends in these impactful legal battles. 

Understanding the Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Landscape 

Hair relaxer lawsuits have become increasingly prevalent, driven by claims linking the use of these products to adverse health effects, including various forms of cancer. Plaintiffs allege that chemicals found in hair relaxers, such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) like phthalates, pose significant risks to consumers. [1]

Recent developments in hair relaxer lawsuit updates underscore the complexity and magnitude of this legal battleground. From pretrial discovery rulings to disputes over dismissal procedures, each development plays a crucial role in shaping the trajectory of these lawsuits and seeking justice for affected individuals. 

Recent Developments in Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Updates 

In March 2024, significant progress was made in pretrial discovery rulings, with a magistrate judge overseeing the selection of potential candidates for the role of Special Master. Additionally, the legacy system discovery process received attention, setting schedules for resolving disputes and updating search methodologies. 

February 2024 brought attention to disputes over dismissal procedures, with plaintiffs advocating for the right to voluntarily dismiss their complaints without prejudice. Meanwhile, defendants emphasized adherence to procedural rules, highlighting the complexities inherent in hair relaxer litigation. 

Insights into Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits 

Central to many hair relaxer lawsuits is the allegation of a nexus between these products and various forms of cancer, including uterine, endometrial, and ovarian cancer. Plaintiffs argue that the chemicals present in hair relaxers, such as DEHP and phthalates, contribute to adverse health outcomes, raising concerns about product safety and consumer protection. 

Legal pursuits in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits aim to secure compensation and justice for individuals impacted by the alleged health risks associated with these products. With thousands of pending cases and ongoing litigation, the path to resolution remains complex, requiring careful navigation and legal expertise. 

Class Action Hair Relaxer Litigation: Current Status 

Class action hair relaxer litigation continues to evolve, with thousands of lawsuits pending in multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Illinois. Despite the absence of trials or global settlements, lawyers anticipate further filings and developments in the litigation process. 

Optimize Your Strategy with Tailored Reporting and Analytics

Utilizing our advanced intake process, we efficiently gather and analyze extensive data to oversee the intake operations effectively.

Key metrics we monitor encompass:

  • Revenue origins
  • Incoming call volumes
  • Duration of calls
  • Web and chat response times
  • Outbound call activities
  • Call resolutions

We furnish detailed insights into leads and pinpoint conversion prospects. Leveraging this information, you can refine your marketing strategies to boost business revenue by gaining a deeper understanding of your target demographic.

Obtain 24/7, 365 intake and answering support

Join forces with Alert Communications for mass tort litigation solutions. Prepare for lead surges with adept administrative and intake assistance from seasoned industry experts. Reach out to our team online or dial 800-211-4563 to explore our services and how we can fortify your business endeavors.


  1. Drug Watch. Chemical Hair Straightener Lawsuits.